“Subrogation” seems to be a simple concept. You suffer a loss. Your insurance company pays for the loss. Your insurance company then assumes your rights against the party that damaged you. But, like everything in the insurance world, subrogation can result in numerous complications. The problem, of course, is that if your insurance company doesn’t
settlement
Beware the differences between indemnity agreements and insurance policies
I used to know a guy who worked for a major, nationally known public adjustment company. In years where there were no major hurricanes or tornado incidents, he would literally walk around looking like he had the weight of the world on his shoulders. He never overtly wished death or destruction on anyone (as far…
Sandy and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance
As the weeks following Sandy have stretched into months, and the months are beginning to stretch into years, businesses and homeowners with unresolved claims have been asking me whether it’s worthwhile to complain about their carrier to the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (“DOBI”). Truth be told, it’s a complete waste of time.
Bad Faith and Settlement Negotiations
Here’s an interesting question recently confronted by the Ninth Circuit: Is it bad faith for an insurance company to refuse to initiate settlement discussions in a third-party context when liability has become reasonably clear? The carrier (Deerbrook, an Allstate company) took the position that bad faith could not exist unless the carrier failed to…
Potential pitfalls in settling with insurance companies
Here’s an interesting situation that recently came up. A general contractor (Aristone) got sued in a construction defect case involving continuous water damage to a building over several policy periods, involving several insurance companies. One of Aristone’s carriers – OneBeacon – stepped up to provide a defense. Another – Pennsylvania Manufacturers – took a “no…
Triggering excess coverage through underlying settlements
Here’s a fairly common circumstance in large commercial liability claims. A policyholder settles with the carrier in Layer 1 for less than its limits, leaving a gap between Layer 1 and the next layer up. Does the carrier in Layer 2 then have an obligation to contribute to settlement with the underlying plaintiff?
Example: I…
Coverage for class action settlements
Here’s a fairly frequent scenario in the insurance world. The carrier takes a “no- pay” position on a liability claim. The policyholder settles the case and then seeks reimbursement from the carrier in a coverage suit. What exactly does the policyholder have to prove in order to get paid?
In Fireman’s Fund v. Security Ins.
The insurance company’s duty to pay for settlement following denial of coverage
I’m currently preparing to try another coverage case. This one involves the question of whether an insurance company, having denied a defense outright, can later second-guess the amount of defense costs and settlement paid by the policyholder out of its own pocket.
In preparing the case, I came across an interesting opinion written by the…
Settling with insurance companies
Over at Settlement Perspectives, they have some good advice about working with your insurance carrier to resolve disputes. These include: “Insurers hate surprises. Communication is key.”
I will add the following. You must observe the rules of the ritual. Insurance companies are huge bureaucracies, and like all bureaucracies, they have their sometimes arcane procedures for getting…