I confess: I sometimes wonder whether some claims personnel have ever heard of the “red face” test. In other words, you should only take a negotiating position if it doesn’t actually cause you to blush. Otherwise, how could seemingly rational people contend that buying “expanded” coverage means that the policyholder has no coverage? (And how
Contract construction
Advertising Injury Coverage and “Implied Disparagement”
Insurance claims personnel have a natural, probably genetic, aversion to certain topics. One of them is insurance coverage for “advertising injury.” So, if your advertising injury claim is in any way unusual, chances are that as a policyholder you’re going to run into trouble with your carrier.
Some brief background: Commercial general liability policies typically…
The “Wrongful Acts” Exclusion and the Duty to Defend
There’s a funny (perhaps unintentionally so) website called The Robing Room, on which lawyers rate judges in various categories. The site is funny mostly because, from reading the reviews, you can generally predict who won and who lost a case before that particular judge. Take, for example, Judge Joseph F. Bianco of the Eastern District…
Claims-Made Coverage and “Related Wrongful Acts”
Claims-made policies were supposed to simplify things. In an article a few years back, insurance expert Fred Fisher noted that the idea behind such policies was to provide greater actuarial certainty for insurance companies, by ensuring that there would be no more claim activity following the end of a policy period (eliminating the “incurred…
Flood insurance and basements
A group of owners of hurricane-damaged homes have brought a putative class action in federal court in Newark, arguing that their flood insurance carriers are short-changing them by calling their first floors “basements”. The case is Donnelly v. New Jersey Re-Insurance Co., Docket No. 12-cv-7629, and was filed by Union City solo Jeffrey Bronster.…
Actual cash value and replacement cost
Large first-party property damage cases often come down to a battle of accountants. In other words, unlike Olympic beach volleyball, they’re usually not particularly thrilling to watch. (Not that I have anything against accountants.) But the results of the battle can have a major impact on the policyholder’s balance sheet. How is the policyholder’s claim…
The “Eight Corners” Rule and the Duty to Defend
One of the issues that frequently comes up in complicated third-party cases is: How far outside the underlying complaint does the carrier have to go to determine whether coverage exists? New Jersey is not an “eight corners” state (in which all the court considers is the four corners of the policy and the four corners…
Coverage for “stigma” damages
Let’s say you own a factory building. Construction activity on an adjacent lot causes damage to the structure. You have the standard first-party property insurance policy providing coverage for “direct physical loss or damage,” and the policy gives the carrier the option of paying either the “cost of repair” or “loss of value.” If the carrier…
What is an “occurrence”?
When I started in this business at Anderson Kill back in the 1980s (when the firm was still Anderson Russell Kill & Olick, P.C.), junior lawyers (including me) would do anything, and I mean anything, to keep from sliding into the abyss known as the Insurance Coverage Group. Who wanted to while away his or…
Business Risk Exclusions
Those of us who represent contractors in coverage disputes have had to wrestle a lot over the past few years with so-called “business risk” exclusions, such as the “your work” and “your product” exclusions. Cynicism may be unhealthy, but the cynic in me says that insurance companies are twisting these exclusions far beyond their intended…